O que você vai aprender
- Rastrear diferenças entre associação e explicação causal.
- Reconhecer que evidências quantitativas e relatos respondem a perguntas diferentes.
Escute o alcance de cada tipo de evidência
Prática de listening
Mostrar transcrição
Chair: Our first-year data show that students who attend weekly advising sessions are more likely to return next term. Can we say advising improves retention? Dr. Patel: Not yet. Students who seek advising may differ in motivation or available time. The association is useful, but it does not isolate the effect of the sessions. Professor Green: I agree about causality. Still, interviews reveal that many students value having one person explain deadlines and options. Those accounts do not estimate how common the experience is, but they tell us what advising may provide. Chair: Could we compare participation across similar student groups and continue interviews? Dr. Patel: Yes, provided non-participants are not treated as a control group without examining why they did not attend. Professor Green: And the evaluation should report whether evening access changes who can participate.
Confira sua compreensão
Atividade 1 · Identifique uma contribuição
Atividade 2 · escolha
Why examine why students did not attend before using them as a control group?
Atividade 3 · escolha
What access issue should the evaluation report?
Resumo da aula
A associação entre aconselhamento e permanência precisa de cautela. Dados comparativos e entrevistas podem responder perguntas complementares.
Aprender com orientação
Quer estudar com a Jô?
Conheça as aulas particulares e veja se o formato combina com seus objetivos.
Conhecer as aulas